¹ú²úAV

2024-UNAT-1492

2024-UNAT-1492, Alain Bertrand Kamdem Souop

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The UNAT held that the UNDT did not err in finding that the staff member’s application was not receivable because he failed to request management evaluation of the contested decision within the 60-day statutory time limit. The UNAT determined that, since the staff member was notified on 27 and 28 April 2022 of the rejection of his request for medical evaluation, he had 60 days from that date to submit his request for management evaluation. However, he only submitted his request to the Management Evaluation Unit on 3 November 2022, and later to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) on 27 January 2023.  Therefore, he filed it well beyond the statutory deadline in both instances.

Furthermore, the UNAT held that his request for reconsideration, submitted on 3 June 2022, was not a valid substitute for a request for management evaluation, nor did it suspend the time limits for submitting such a request to the competent authorities.

Finally, the UNAT found that the implicit UNDP’s decision to refuse reimbursement of medical evacuation expenses dated 21 November 2022 could not be considered as the contested decision.

The UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed Judgment No. UNDT/2024/021.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

A staff member of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) contested the decision to reject his request for reimbursement of medical evacuation costs.

In its Judgment No. UNDT/2024/021, the UNDT concluded that his application was not receivable ratione materiae because he filed it without having previously submitted a timely request for management evaluation.

Staff member appealed. 

Legal Principle(s)

Requesting management evaluation is a mandatory first step before coming to the internal justice system. Indeed, the purpose of management evaluation is to afford the Administration the opportunity to correct quickly and efficiently any errors in an administrative decision so that judicial review of the administrative decision is not necessary. Consequently, the Tribunals have no jurisdiction to waive deadlines for requests for management evaluation.

A request for management evaluation must be submitted within the applicable time limit, which is 60 calendar days from the date on which the staff member received notification of the administrative decision to be contested. A party may not unilaterally determine the date of the administrative decision. On the contrary, the date of an administrative decision is based on objective elements that both parties (Administration and staff member) can accurately determine. Furthermore, the reiteration of an original administrative decision, if repeatedly questioned by a staff member, does not reset the clock with respect to statutory time limits.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.