UNDT/2024/021

UNDT/2024/021, Kamdem Souop

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to determine this application on the merits as it challenges a decision that was not submitted for management evaluation in a timely manner.

The Tribunal also considered the merits of the Applicant’s submissions in respect of the propriety of the impugned decision. The Applicant incurred expenses that were clearly communicated to him as unauthorised prior to his travel. There is nothing on the record to show that the decision was tainted, improperly made or otherwise unlawful. In other words, even if the application had been found to be receivable, it would have failed on the merits.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the Respondent’s decision to reject his request for medical evacuation (“MEDEVAC”) and the request for reimbursement of his MEDEVAC costs.

Legal Principle(s)

The Applicant was required to challenge, in a timely manner, the impugned decision and any alleged effects it had on him. A timely challenge had to be initiated by a request for management evaluation within 60 days of the date of the impugned decision.

Repeated requests to reconsider the original decision do not reset the clock for filing a management evaluation request.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Kamdem Souop

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :