The Secretary-General’s decision to allow the applicants to resubmit their cases to the CAC within 90 days was reasonable and fair. The CAC is the legitimate and appropriate body to hear the applicants’ request for a review of a reclassification decision. In view of the JAB’s report, the lack of information provided during the period in question and the respondent’s silence in explaining the delays in the period from 2000-04, the Tribunal finds that compensation for the excessive delay in responding to the original request for reclassification is warranted, as is compensation for the breach of...
Rule 112.3
-
Appendix B
3
-
Chapter IV
1
-
Chapter IX
2
-
Chapter VII
1
-
Chapter X
4
-
Chapter XI
1
-
Rule 1.2(h)
2
-
Rule 10.2
3
-
Rule 10.2(a)(ix)
2
-
Rule 10.3(a)
3
-
Rule 10.4(c)
1
-
Rule 10.4b
1
-
Rule 101.1
1
-
Rule 101.2(2)
1
-
Rule 101.2(a)
1
-
Rule 101.2(b)
6
-
Rule 101.2(c)
2
-
Rule 101.2(d)
11
-
Rule 101.2(g)
3
-
Rule 101.2(h)
1
-
Rule 101.4(a)
1
-
Rule 103.13
1
-
Rule 103.20
1
-
Rule 103.21(a)
1
-
Rule 103.24
1
-
Rule 103.24(a)
1
-
Rule 103.7(d)(ii)
1
-
Rule 103.9
2
-
Rule 103.9(a)
1
-
Rule 104.1
1
-
Rule 104.10
1
-
Rule 104.10(a)
4
-
Rule 104.12
5
-
Rule 104.12(a)
1
-
Rule 104.12(b)
17
-
Rule 104.12(b)(i)
2
-
Rule 104.12(b)(ii)
13
-
Rule 104.12(b)(iii)
2
-
Rule 104.13
3
-
Rule 104.13(a)
1
-
Rule 104.13(c)
6
-
Rule 104.14
4
-
Rule 104.14(a)(i)
6
-
Rule 104.14(h)(i)
1
-
Rule 104.15
1
-
Rule 104.15(b)(i)
1
-
Rule 104.3
5
-
Rule 104.4
3
-
Rule 104.4(e)
1
-
Rule 104.6
3
-
Rule 104.6(b)
1
-
Rule 104.7
2
-
Rule 104.7(a)
1
-
Rule 104.8
2
-
Rule 105
1
-
Rule 105.1(b)
2
-
Rule 105.1(b)(iii)
1
-
Rule 105.1(c)
1
-
Rule 105.2
3
-
Rule 105.2(a)
1
-
Rule 105.2(a)(i)
3
-
Rule 105.2(a)(ii)
1
-
Rule 105.2(a)(iii)b
1
-
Rule 105.3
2
-
Rule 105.3(d)
1
-
Rule 105.3(d)(iii)
1
-
Rule 106.2
2
-
Rule 106.2(a)
1
-
Rule 106.2(c)
2
-
Rule 106.2(g)
1
-
Rule 106.6
2
-
Rule 107
1
-
Rule 107.1
1
-
Rule 107.21
1
-
Rule 107.21(h)
1
-
Rule 107.27
1
-
Rule 107.28
1
-
Rule 107.28(c)
1
-
Rule 107.4(b)
1
-
Rule 107.6
1
-
Rule 108.1
1
-
Rule 108.2
1
-
Rule 109.1
1
-
Rule 109.1(b)
2
-
Rule 109.1(c)
4
-
Rule 109.1(c)(i)
1
-
Rule 109.1(c)(ii)(a)
1
-
Rule 109.15
1
-
Rule 109.3
1
-
Rule 109.5(h)
1
-
Rule 109.7
7
-
Rule 109.7(a)
5
-
Rule 109.8
2
-
Rule 11.2
3
-
Rule 11.2(c)
3
-
Rule 110.1
8
-
Rule 110.2
4
-
Rule 110.2(a)
3
-
Rule 110.3
8
-
Rule 110.3(a)
2
-
Rule 110.3(a)(i)
2
-
Rule 110.3(a)(iv)
1
-
Rule 110.3(a)(viii)
1
-
Rule 110.3(b)
2
-
Rule 110.3(b)(i)
1
-
Rule 110.3(vii)
1
-
Rule 110.4
8
-
Rule 110.4(a)
1
-
Rule 110.4(c)
3
-
Rule 110.7
1
-
Rule 110.7(b)
1
-
Rule 111
1
-
Rule 111.1
3
-
Rule 111.2
11
-
Rule 111.2(a)
61
-
Rule 111.2(a)(f)
1
-
Rule 111.2(a)(i)
3
-
Rule 111.2(a)(i)(ii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(a)(ii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(c)
1
-
Rule 111.2(c)(iii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(e)
1
-
Rule 111.2(f)
24
-
Rule 111.2(p)
1
-
Rule 111.2(q)
1
-
Rule 111.4(b)
1
-
Rule 112.2
1
-
Rule 112.2(a)
1
-
Rule 112.2(b)
6
-
Rule 112.2(f)
1
-
Rule 112.3
2
-
Rule 112.7
1
-
Rule 200.2(b)
1
-
Rule 204.3
5
-
Rule 204.3(d)
1
-
Rule 205.3(a)(iii)
1
-
Rule 208.5(a)
1
-
Rule 209.2(a)
1
-
Rule 209.2(c)
1
-
Rule 209.5
1
-
Rule 3
1
-
Rule 3.13(a)(iii)
1
-
Rule 3.17(c)(ii)
1
-
Rule 301.1
3
-
Rule 301.3
1
-
Rule 301.3(d)
1
-
Rule 301.3(q)(ii)
1
-
Rule 301.4
2
-
Rule 304.1
2
-
Rule 304.3
1
-
Rule 304.4
2
-
Rule 304.4(a)
4
-
Rule 304.4(b)
1
-
Rule 304(a)
1
-
Rule 309.2
3
-
Rule 309.3
2
-
Rule 309.4
2
-
Rule 309.5(a)
3
-
Rule 309.5(b)
1
-
Rule 310.1
2
-
Rule 310.1(e)(ii)
1
-
Rule 310.1(e)(iv)
1
-
Rule 311.1
1
-
Rule 312.6
1
-
Rule 4.17
2
-
Rule 4.4(b)
1
-
Rule 5.3
1
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
TEST -Rename- Benefits and entitlements-45
Compensation
Staff selection (non-selection/non-promotion)
In the present judgment, UNDT found that, in light of the circumstances of this case, the three months’ net base salary paid to the Applicant for the lack of due process on the recommendation of the JAB report was insufficient. UNDT found the procedural unfairness to be so grave that it warranted additional compensation in the amount of USD15,000 for the breach of the Applicant’s procedural rights. With respect to compensation for actual economic loss, UNDT held that the Respondent shall compensate the Applicant for the actual economic loss incurred by her and that the actual economic loss...