Receivability of the decision not to renew the appointment: In this case, the triggering point should have been the moment when the staff member was made aware by the Administration that there was no reasonable chance or possibility of renewal. Thus, it is the date when the applicant was notified of the termination of her contract; therefore, the application is receivable. Articles 13 and 14 of the Rules of Procedure: Since there is an ongoing management evaluation of the decision not to renew the applicant’s appointment, the applicable interim measure to be ordered would be that under article...
Rule 104.12(b)(i)
-
Appendix B
3
-
Chapter IV
1
-
Chapter IX
2
-
Chapter VII
1
-
Chapter X
4
-
Chapter XI
1
-
Rule 1.2(h)
2
-
Rule 10.2
3
-
Rule 10.2(a)(ix)
2
-
Rule 10.3(a)
3
-
Rule 10.4(c)
1
-
Rule 10.4b
1
-
Rule 101.1
1
-
Rule 101.2(2)
1
-
Rule 101.2(a)
1
-
Rule 101.2(b)
6
-
Rule 101.2(c)
2
-
Rule 101.2(d)
11
-
Rule 101.2(g)
3
-
Rule 101.2(h)
1
-
Rule 101.4(a)
1
-
Rule 103.13
1
-
Rule 103.20
1
-
Rule 103.21(a)
1
-
Rule 103.24
1
-
Rule 103.24(a)
1
-
Rule 103.7(d)(ii)
1
-
Rule 103.9
2
-
Rule 103.9(a)
1
-
Rule 104.1
1
-
Rule 104.10
1
-
Rule 104.10(a)
4
-
Rule 104.12
5
-
Rule 104.12(a)
1
-
Rule 104.12(b)
17
-
Rule 104.12(b)(i)
2
-
Rule 104.12(b)(ii)
13
-
Rule 104.12(b)(iii)
2
-
Rule 104.13
3
-
Rule 104.13(a)
1
-
Rule 104.13(c)
6
-
Rule 104.14
4
-
Rule 104.14(a)(i)
6
-
Rule 104.14(h)(i)
1
-
Rule 104.15
1
-
Rule 104.15(b)(i)
1
-
Rule 104.3
5
-
Rule 104.4
3
-
Rule 104.4(e)
1
-
Rule 104.6
3
-
Rule 104.6(b)
1
-
Rule 104.7
2
-
Rule 104.7(a)
1
-
Rule 104.8
2
-
Rule 105
1
-
Rule 105.1(b)
2
-
Rule 105.1(b)(iii)
1
-
Rule 105.1(c)
1
-
Rule 105.2
3
-
Rule 105.2(a)
1
-
Rule 105.2(a)(i)
3
-
Rule 105.2(a)(ii)
1
-
Rule 105.2(a)(iii)b
1
-
Rule 105.3
2
-
Rule 105.3(d)
1
-
Rule 105.3(d)(iii)
1
-
Rule 106.2
2
-
Rule 106.2(a)
1
-
Rule 106.2(c)
2
-
Rule 106.2(g)
1
-
Rule 106.6
2
-
Rule 107
1
-
Rule 107.1
1
-
Rule 107.21
1
-
Rule 107.21(h)
1
-
Rule 107.27
1
-
Rule 107.28
1
-
Rule 107.28(c)
1
-
Rule 107.4(b)
1
-
Rule 107.6
1
-
Rule 108.1
1
-
Rule 108.2
1
-
Rule 109.1
1
-
Rule 109.1(b)
2
-
Rule 109.1(c)
4
-
Rule 109.1(c)(i)
1
-
Rule 109.1(c)(ii)(a)
1
-
Rule 109.15
1
-
Rule 109.3
1
-
Rule 109.5(h)
1
-
Rule 109.7
7
-
Rule 109.7(a)
5
-
Rule 109.8
2
-
Rule 11.2
3
-
Rule 11.2(c)
3
-
Rule 110.1
8
-
Rule 110.2
4
-
Rule 110.2(a)
3
-
Rule 110.3
8
-
Rule 110.3(a)
2
-
Rule 110.3(a)(i)
2
-
Rule 110.3(a)(iv)
1
-
Rule 110.3(a)(viii)
1
-
Rule 110.3(b)
2
-
Rule 110.3(b)(i)
1
-
Rule 110.3(vii)
1
-
Rule 110.4
8
-
Rule 110.4(a)
1
-
Rule 110.4(c)
3
-
Rule 110.7
1
-
Rule 110.7(b)
1
-
Rule 111
1
-
Rule 111.1
3
-
Rule 111.2
11
-
Rule 111.2(a)
61
-
Rule 111.2(a)(f)
1
-
Rule 111.2(a)(i)
3
-
Rule 111.2(a)(i)(ii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(a)(ii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(c)
1
-
Rule 111.2(c)(iii)
1
-
Rule 111.2(e)
1
-
Rule 111.2(f)
24
-
Rule 111.2(p)
1
-
Rule 111.2(q)
1
-
Rule 111.4(b)
1
-
Rule 112.2
1
-
Rule 112.2(a)
1
-
Rule 112.2(b)
6
-
Rule 112.2(f)
1
-
Rule 112.3
2
-
Rule 112.7
1
-
Rule 200.2(b)
1
-
Rule 204.3
5
-
Rule 204.3(d)
1
-
Rule 205.3(a)(iii)
1
-
Rule 208.5(a)
1
-
Rule 209.2(a)
1
-
Rule 209.2(c)
1
-
Rule 209.5
1
-
Rule 3
1
-
Rule 3.13(a)(iii)
1
-
Rule 3.17(c)(ii)
1
-
Rule 301.1
3
-
Rule 301.3
1
-
Rule 301.3(d)
1
-
Rule 301.3(q)(ii)
1
-
Rule 301.4
2
-
Rule 304.1
2
-
Rule 304.3
1
-
Rule 304.4
2
-
Rule 304.4(a)
4
-
Rule 304.4(b)
1
-
Rule 304(a)
1
-
Rule 309.2
3
-
Rule 309.3
2
-
Rule 309.4
2
-
Rule 309.5(a)
3
-
Rule 309.5(b)
1
-
Rule 310.1
2
-
Rule 310.1(e)(ii)
1
-
Rule 310.1(e)(iv)
1
-
Rule 311.1
1
-
Rule 312.6
1
-
Rule 4.17
2
-
Rule 4.4(b)
1
-
Rule 5.3
1
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
Non-renewal
Separation from service
Termination of appointment (see also, Termination of appointment)
In accordance with former staff rule 104.12(b)(i) and provisional staff rule 4.13(c), the Applicant cannot claim a right to the renewal of her fixed-term appointment. The Applicant claims that the difficult working relationship she had with her supervisor led the latter, with the objective of getting rid of the former, to seek the reclassification of her post at a higher level. However, the Applicant does not prove that the non-extension of her appointment results solely from the desire of her supervisor to remove her from the service, nor that, consequently, the contested decision appears...