UNDT/2023/064

UNDT/2023/064, Rodriguez Santorum

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

There is indeed uncertainty and possibly also disagreement regarding various material facts of the case. Accordingly, the case may not be adjudicated on the basis of a summary judgment.

The part of the present case concerning IOM is not receivable under the legal doctrine of lis pendens.

With regard to the HLIS decision, the Applicant refers to his request for management evaluation of 4 November 2022. As the application in the present case is filed after this date, this part of the application is therefore, from this perspective, now receivable under staff rule 11.2

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contests the rejections of his requests for after-service health insurance (“ASHI”) by (a) IOM and (b) the Health and Life Insurance Section (“HLIS”) in the United Nations Secretariat.

Legal Principle(s)

The Appeals Tribunal in Fasanella 2017-UNAT-765 held that “the Dispute Tribunal has the inherent power to individualize and define the administrative decision challenged by a party and to identify the subject(s) of judicial review”. As such, “the Dispute Tribunal may consider the application as a whole, including the relief or remedies requested by the staff member, in determining the contested or impugned decisions to be reviewed”. See para. 20.

Under the legal doctrine of lis pendens, the same issue cannot be adjudicated in two different cases (see, for instance, the Appeals Tribunal in Haroun 2017-UNAT-720).

The Tribunal notes that under art. 9 of the Dispute Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure (summary judgement), “[a] party may move for summary judgement when there is no dispute as to the material facts of the case and a party is entitled to judgement as a matter of law”.

Outcome

Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

Outcome Extra Text

It is DECIDED that: the Respondent’s request for a summary judgment is rejected; the appeal against the decision of IOM is not receivable; the appeal against the decision of HLIS is receivable.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Rodriguez Santorum

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :