UNDT/2023/047

UNDT/2023/047, Anand

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the Applicant failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he was denied a fair chance of selection. Accordingly, the Tribunal found that the contested selection decision was lawful as the Administration appropriately exercised its discretion in selecting the selected candidate.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to select him for the position of Chief at the P-5 level, Business Transformation and Accountability Unit (“BTAU”), Pension Administration, the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund (“UNJSPF”).

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Anand

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :