UNDT/2023/007, Garay
The Tribunal found that the Applicant鈥檚 challenge of the decision to place a note on the Applicant鈥檚 official status file and UNICEF鈥檚 decision to not make a determination on whether or not the Applicant has committed misconduct is not receivable. The decsions haves no direct consequences on the terms and conditions of the Applicant鈥檚 former appointment.
The Applicant, a former staff member with the United Nations Children鈥檚 Fund (鈥淯NICEF鈥�) filed an application in which she contests the 鈥淸d]ecision to place a note on Applicant鈥檚 official status file which states that 鈥淸i]f [she] were to rejoin UNICEF as a staff member, a disciplinary process would be initiated鈥�.
The Appeals Tribunal has clarified that a contested decision must have a 鈥溾€檇irect鈥� impact and not a future injury鈥� in order to amount to a challengeable administrative decision. The consequences that the Applicant alleges flow from the placement of the note are entirely hypothetical. In particular, the note does not state that the Applicant should not be considered for future employment opportunities at the United Nations. The Appeals Tribunal has held that hypothetical allegations do not amount to direct legal consequences. The issue is whether a former staff member is entitled to the completion of a disciplinary process when an investigation is pending at the time of a staff member鈥檚 separation. The Applicant does not identify any direct legal consequences affecting the terms and conditions of her former appointment because of UNICEF鈥檚 decision to not make a final determination in the investigation. In the absence of any such consequences, there was no contestable administrative decision.