UNDT/2022/044 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

UNDT/2022/044, Shah

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The contested decision identified by the Applicant is not a final administrative decision that is related to the Applicant’s terms of appointment or contract of employment. It is an operational decision of general application that promoted a change in the reporting lines of all staff members serving in that organization. Such a decision is within the scope of the managerial discretion of the organization in question. Accordingly, the application is not receivable ratione materiae.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

An Inter-Office Memorandum that adjusted the structure and reporting lines of staff members serving in the Respondent's organization.

Legal Principle(s)

To be receivable, an application needs to challenge a final administrative decision that is related to the Applicant’s terms of appointment or contract of employment.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

Outcome Extra Text

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Shah

Entity

UNMOGIP

Case Number(s)

UNDT/GVA/2022/011

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry Location :

Geneva