¹ú²úAV

- Having weighed both accounts of the factual background of the case, alongside the evidence on record, the Tribunal finds that there was clear evidence of unsatisfactory performance during the period leading to the Applicant’s separation from service. Thus, it finds no wrong in the decision to terminate the Applican’s continuing appointment. - The accidents reported by the Applicant occurred after she received the letter terminating her contract effective immediately. Hence, at the time of the accident the Applicant was no longer a staff member of the Organization. As a result, she was not entitled to sick leave and, accordingly, there is no basis for her claim that she should have been retained in service to allow her to exhaust her sick leave entitlements prior to her separation. Thus, the contested decision was lawful.