¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2019/182

UNDT/2019/182, Kisia

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The ABCC rectified the procedural irregularities as directed by Judgment No. UNDT/2019/019 in its reconsideration of the Applicant’s claim. The ABCC received and considered a medical opinion of the medical doctor of MSD, who reviewed medical reports submitted by the Applicant along with his prior medical history. While the Applicant made allegations of improper considerations, he did not provide any supporting evidence and these allegations are without merit.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The decision to deny his claim for compensation under Appendix D to the Staff Rules for injuries and illnesses in relation to an incident that occurred on 27 July 2013 UNDT.

Legal Principle(s)

There are two elements that must be established for a claim under Appendix D: (a) whether a claimant suffered from the injury or illness as alleged, and (b) whether the illness or injury was attributable to the performance of official duties on behalf of the Organization. The burden of proving any allegations of ill-motivation rests with the applicant. Decision(s) contested: The decision to deny his claim for compensation under Appendix D to the Staff Rules for injuries and illnesses in relation to an incident that occurred on 27 July 2013 UNDT.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.