UNDT/2019/046

UNDT/2019/046, Mohamed

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Even if the investigation had been completed and it has been decided not to inform the Applicant of its outcome, such decision would still need to be submitted for management evaluation. No matter what the situation is—if a decision has been made on providing the Applicant information on the OIOS investigation or not—the application is not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Failure to provide the Applicant with a document stating the outcome of an investigation in which she is the complainant.

Legal Principle(s)

The Dispute Tribunal is competent to review its own jurisdiction. The Dispute Tribunal can only review an administrative decision that has already been taken and not one that is still pending.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Mohamed

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :