AV

UNDT/2017/017

UNDT/2017/017, Nyasulu

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

In light of the parties’ agreement, the Tribunal accordingly entered judgment as follows: a) The Applicant would be paid four months’ net base salary at the level he encumbered prior to his separation from service on 9 August 2013. b) The Applicant would be paid eight months’ net base salary at the level he encumbered prior to his separation from service on 9 August 2013, less the USD equivalent of EUR59,000 calculated as specified below. c) Pursuant to rule 106.5(a) of the United Nations’ Financial Regulations and Rules, the operational rate of exchange, as established by the Under-Secretary-General for Management, would be used for recording all United Nations transactions. d) The average United Nations operational rate of exchange applicable during the period from November 2013 to July 2014 would be used to convert the Applicant’s occupational earnings of EUR 59,000 into USD.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

On 7 November 2013, the Applicant filed an application challenging the decision to abolish his post and not to renew his contract. The Applicant further contested the decision to require him to go through a competitive recruitment process for the position of Principal, Rule of Law, UNMIL, at the D-1 level.

Legal Principle(s)

On 14 March 2016, the Tribunal issued Judgment No. UNDT/2016/020 in which it, inter alia, awarded the Applicant compensation. The Secretary-General appealed the said Judgment and, on 28 October 2016, the United Nations Appeals Tribunal remanded the case to the UNDT to recalculate the compensation due to the Aplicant using the United Nations Operational Rate of Exchange at the applicable time. On 8 March 2017, the parties filed a “Joint Submission on the Calculation of Compensation” in which they state that they have agreed on the implementation of paragraph 130 of Judgment No. UNDT/2016/020.

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Nyasulu
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Document Topic/Theme :