¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2016/086

UNDT/2016/086, Kazagic

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that it was established by clear and convincing evidence that the Applicant had had sexual intercourse with two persons under the age of eighteen and that the sanction of dismissal, together with a fine, were proportionate to the established misconduct. This conclusion was independent from the outcome of the judicial proceedings before the national courts of Kosovo with respect to the violation(s) of the CCK. Standard of review of disciplinary matters: In reviewing disciplinary matters, the Tribunal must examine(1) whether the facts on which the disciplinary measure was based have been established; (2) whether the established facts legally amount to misconduct under the Rules and Regulations of the United Nations, and(3) whether the disciplinary measure applied is proportionate to the offence. To that effect, the Tribunal has to freely form its conviction in assessing the truth of the disputed facts, on the basis of the available evidence. In cases of termination, the Tribunal has to take into account the standard of proof established by the jurisprudence of the United Nations Appeals Tribunal (UNAT) in the case of Molari 2011-UNAT-164. Whether the facts were established: A conviction by a first instance court, together with the Applicant’s free admission at trial of having had sexual intercourse with two persons while they were under the age of eighteen—which is the relevant age for the purpose of the United Nations Rules and Regulations—constitutes clear and convincing evidence for that charge of misconduct. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the argument that this admission had been made on the basis of falsified birth certificates lacks any foundation. Since misconduct based on underlying criminal acts does not depend upon the staff member being convicted of a crime in a national court, the conclusion by the Tribunal is without prejudice to the potential outcome of the Applicant’s appeal before the higher national courts. Proportionality of the disciplinary measure: Based on the goal of ST/SGB/2003/13 to further especially protect women and children, sexual intercourse with children alone justifies a severe disciplinary measure, regardless of the outcome of the judicial proceedings before the national courts with respect to the violation of the national criminal law.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a former staff member of UNMIK, contests the disciplinary measures of dismissal and a fine of three months net base salary. Prior to his dismissal, the Applicant was sentenced to a 14-year imprisonment by the Basic Court of Mitrovica, Kosovo, for the following criminal offences under the Criminal Code of Kosovo (CCK): Sexual abuse of persons under the age of 16 years; Attempted facilitating prostitution; Attempted sexual assault and Rape. The Applicant appealed his sentence and at the time of the UNDT judgment, the appeal was still pending. In his testimony before the Basic Court of Mitrovica, the Applicant admitted having had sexual intercourse with two girls under the age of eighteen years, although he was represented by counsel and was instructed by the Presiding Judge of his right to be silent. The relevant age for a conviction under the CCK is sixteen, whereas under the relevant rules of the United Nations it is eighteen.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.