¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2013/150

UNDT/2013/150, Said

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Legitimate expectation: While a legitimate expectation can be created by an express promise on the part of the Organization, the Tribunal held that a promise can also be implied from the particular circumstances of a case or from what is held out to an individual. The Tribunal concluded that the Applicant did not have a legitimate expectation of renewal. Performance appraisal: When a staff member is given a rating indicating that he/she meets most expectations but that there is room for improvement, there is an implicit undertaking by the Administration that the staff member will be allowed to continue in his/her employment and that he/she should take steps with the assistance of management as provided by the rules to improve. Improvement rests primarily with the staff member but the rules also require that the appropriate supervisor offers support or guidance to that staff member. The Tribunal concluded that all elementary rules of fairness in regard to performance and improvement were simply ignored by the Respondent leaving the overall impression that the main aim of management was to hurriedly get rid of the Applicant.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant is contesting the decisions by UNICEF not to renew his fixed term appointment and not to regularize the National Officer post he was serving on from level B (NOB) to level C (NOC). He alleges that he had a legitimate expectation of renewal due to several factors.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

The Applicant was awarded financial compensation.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Said
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law