AV

UNDT/2012/203

UNDT/2012/203, Featherstone

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Administrative decision: Measures taken on the basis of ST/SGB/2008/5 must not be considered as preliminary decisions that cannot be contested. The absence of a response to an Applicant’s specific requests may amount to an implicit administrative decision, if it has direct legal consequences on the Applicant’s rights as a staff member.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a former staff member of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (“ICTY”), requested the Tribunal to find that the procedures in referring a fact-finding Panel Report to the Assistant Secretary General for Human Resources Management and not providing her with access to the documents in support of such referral (e.g. Investigation Report) were wrongful and violated her due process rights. The Applicant further requested the award of compensation for moral damages. The Tribunal found that proceedings of a preliminary investigation conducted under ST/SGB/2008/5 can be appealed under Chapter XI of the UN Staff Rules. Exercise of this right is subject to statutory time-limits for submission of a management evaluation request that were not adhered to in the instant case. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the absence of a formal response to the Applicant’s requests for access to documentary evidence has to be regarded as an implicit final refusal which may have direct legal consequences on the Applicant’s rights as a staff member and, thus, constitutes an administrative decision open to judicial review.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Featherstone
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type