UNDT/2012/042

UNDT/2012/042, Prljaca

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Management evaluation: Pursuant to well-settled case law of the Dispute Tribunal and the Appeals Tribunal, requests for administrative review or management evaluation are mandatory first steps in the appeal process. Improper motives: The onus is on the applicant to provide sufficient evidence that the contested decision was tainted by improper motives.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contests two decisions, first the decision to discontinue her post, which was notified to her in writing on 26 August 2010, and second, the decision to terminate her indefinite appointment, which was notified to her on 30 November 2010. However, she only requested management evaluation of the first decision. The Tribunal finds accordingly that the appeal is receivable only insofar as it concerns the first decision. The Tribunal further finds that the Applicant did not produce any evidence that the decision to discontinue her post was arbitrary or based on improper motives.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Prljaca

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :