¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2011/180

UNDT/2011/180, Cremades

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal rejected the application, as the Applicant had failed to observe the (then) statutory two-month time limit to request administrative review. It considered that the Administration’s response of 3 June 2009 was sufficiently clear to amount to an administrative decision open to appeal. Subsequent denials by the Administration were only confirmative decisions. Moreover, the Tribunal may not waive the time limits for management evaluation and the entry into force of new Staff Rules on 1 July 2009 did not modify these limits. Confirmative decisions: When a staff member has submitted several requests to the Administration concerning the same matter, only the first decision of refusal is appealable. Subsequent refusals by the Administration, further to new requests concerning the same matter are confirmative decisions which may not extend the time limits for management evaluation.Outcome: Application rejected on receivability

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

On 1 May 2009, the Applicant, a former staff member who retired on 31 July 2009, requested the Administration to either extend her contract so as to cover the annual leave she claimed to have accrued during the first half of 2009, or award her a compensation which took into account her annual leave entitlements. This request was denied on 3 June 2009. As the Applicant renewed her request, the negative decision was confirmed on 1 July 2010. She submitted a request for administrative review on 25 August 2010.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Cremades
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type