¹ú²úAV

UNDT held that the Applicant clearly identified the administrative decision she wished to contest, and the fact that her Counsel stated that the contested decision was dated 14 April 2010 (the day of her being advised of her non-selection) and not 13 July 2010 (the date of the OIOS/USG’s ultimate selection decision) did not make any difference, as the latter decision was merely confirming the former and could be perceived as being impliedly contested in the application. UNDT also held that the Under Secretary-General of the Office of Internal Oversight Services’ ultimate selection decision underwent management evaluation and that the Management Evaluation Unit made a direct reference to the ultimate selection decision of 13 Jult 2010 and based its decision thereon, making the question of whether this decision is implied moot. UNDT dismissed the Respondent’s claim that the application was not receivable.