¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2011/093

UNDT/2011/093, Deng Deng

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal held that the Organization has a discretionary power to organize its work and offices. However, it reiterated the general principle that such a power is not absolute; the Organization has the authority to reorganize an office and terminate a staff member’s contract so long as that the decision is not tainted by extraneous factors or improper motives. Based on the facts and evidence adduced by the parties, the Tribunal found that the decision to phase out the programme for which the Applicant had been recruited had been made on the basis of an evaluation made by external consultants who had found that the programme failed to meet the needs of the population of Somalia. The reform towards a new programme took place over several months, during which the Applicant was informed of the need to change the programme. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted that the decision to close down the said programme had been made by the donors, the Respondent having only played an advisory role with regards to the effectiveness of the programme. In the Tribunal’s view, the Applicant failed to prove that the restructuration had for sole aim to abolish his post. As to the Applicant’s contention that his contract was terminated while he was on sick leave, the Tribunal found that the Applicant was fit to return to work when his contract ended. It further noted that the Respondent extended the Applicant’s contract for another two months after the end of the RRIDP programme in order to help him find alternative employment and recover from his extended sick leave. The Tribunal therefore did not find any evidence that the Respondent breached the Applicant’s right to due process as provided in ST/AI/2005/3.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant is contesting the decision by UNDP not to renew his appointment. He alleged that the decision was influenced by improper motives and was in breach of due process as he was on extended sick leave at the time the decision not to renew the contract was taken. The Respondent submitted that the Applicant’s contract was not renewed as a result of the abolition of the programme for which he was recruited as a Programme Manager.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Deng Deng
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type