UNDT/2011/060

UNDT/2011/060, Finniss

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that there was a failure of procedure and a violation of the Applicant’s rights during both selection exercises. In this respect, the Tribunal held that the decision not to select the Applicant for the New York post was unlawful as the selection process was tainted by prejudice, which resulted in his candidacy not being given full and fair consideration. With respect to the Vienna post, the Tribunal held that once the programme case officer decided to test and interview the Applicant, who was a roster candidate, afresh with new candidates, it was inherently unfair for the Applicant to be deprived of the properly documented evaluation required by ST/AI/2006/3.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a staff member of OIOS, contests two different non-selection decisions for Senior Investigator positions at the P-5 level in New York and Vienna. The Applicant asserted that he had been denied full and fair consideration for promotion and that the selection processes for both the New York and Vienna posts lacked transparency and consistency. He alleged that he had been subjected to prejudicial and/or discriminatory conduct for nearly two years and his non-selection for the posts was merely a continuation of this treatment by senior managers of OIOS.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

Outcome Extra Text

The Respondent is to compensate Applicant in the amount of 18 months net base salary for the egregious and discriminatory actions he was subjected to during the selection exercise for the New York post. Further, the Respondent is to compensate the Applicant in the amount of 6 months net base salary for the failure to fully and fairly consider his candidacy for the Vienna post.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Finniss

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :