¹ú²úAV

2020-UNAT-1012

2020-UNAT-1012, Heftberger

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT denied the request for an oral hearing, finding it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. UNAT held, recalling the Spinardi jurisprudence (judgment No. 2019-UNAT-957), that the decision on the Appellant’s complaints was not made utilizing a neutral first instance process as required jurisdictionally by Article 2. 10 of the UNAT Statute. UNAT noted that the appealed decision was made by the ICAO Secretary-General whose own earlier decision(s) the Appellant had challenged. UNAT allowed the appeal and set aside the ICAO Secretary-General’s and/or the AJAB’s decision and remanded the case to AJAB for decision in accordance with Article 2.10 of the UNAT Statute.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to appoint her to a post. The ICAO AJAB recommended her appeal be dismissed. The ICAO Secretary-General accepted the ICAO AJAB recommendation and rejected the appeal.

Legal Principle(s)

In order to establish UNAT’s jurisdiction, an agency, Organisation or entity must utilize a neutral first instance process that includes a written record and a written decision. Neither the opinion nor a recommendation of the ICAO Advisory JointAppeals Board (AJAB) or the subsequent ICAO Secretary-General’s decision can be considered a neutral first instance process.

Outcome
Appeal granted
Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Heftberger
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type