¹ú²úAV

The Applicants contested the decisions not to renew their appointment on grounds of the abolition of their posts. UNDT held that: the Appellant’s challenges to the abolition of their posts were not receivable on the grounds that staff members lacked standing to challenge a decision taken by the General Assembly; the Appellant’s challenges to the non-renewal of their appointments were not receivable in so far as they were properly implemented in consequence of the General Assembly’s decision to abolish their posts; the contested administrative decision taken as a result of the decision of the General Assembly was lawful; the relevant Administrative Instruction was not contravened by the subsequent recruitment of the Appellant’s under Individual Contractor contracts, and no unequal treatment occurred in the implementation of the Mission’s restructuring.