¹ú²úAV

UNAT considered seven motions submitted by Ms Rangel prior to a judgment on the merits. On the two Motions for Interim Relief, UNAT held that Ms Rangel did not seek an interim measure for temporary relief consistent with the pronouncements of the ICJ Conciliation Committee, but rather she sought interim relief in cases where the Committee had dismissed her applications. UNAT held that since one of the two cumulative conditions under Article 9(4) of the UNAT Statute was not fulfilled, it did not need to further consider the second condition. UNAT denied the requests for interim relief. On the Motion for Transmission of Important Information, UNAT dismissed the motion as Ms. Rangel failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances. On the Motion of Transmission of Information and her request for interim measures regarding her safety, UNAT held that since one of the two cumulative considerations under Article 9(4) of the UNAT Statute was not fulfilled, it did not need to further consider the second condition and dismissed the application. On the Motions for Confidentiality, UNAT held that there was no reason for a confidential filing of the documents in question and lifted the confidentiality of the document containing declarations of witnesses who testified to the 2 December 2014 incident. UNAT instructed the Registrar of UNAT to strike the document containing declarations of former staff members from the record. UNAT dismissed all seven motions under consideration.