2015-UNAT-519, Ivanov
UNAT held that the matter under investigation was closed and the Appellant had not presented any cogent argument to show that there were exceptional circumstances that might otherwise have entitled him to the investigation report. UNAT held that the Appellant was not entitled to receive a detailed copy of the investigation report. UNAT held that there was no evidence to support the argument that UNDT erred on questions of law and fact. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.
The Applicant contested the decision not to take further action in response to his complaint of harassment and abuse of authority, including his refusal to provide him with a copy of the investigation report. UNDT dismissed the application.
Left deliberately blank