¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2010/205, Adorna

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNDT reiterated that, as it had held in Adorna UNDT/2009/012, the Applicant’s claims concerning the propriety of the letter of reprimand were not receivable and this case was limited to the following contested decisions: (i) the refusal to allow the Applicant access to the investigation report; (ii) the refusal to pay the Applicant’s legal expenses; and (iii) the refusal to issue internal and public announcements acknowledging his exoneration. UNDT found that the Applicant’s request for the investigation report was reasonable and that the obligations of good faith and fair dealing required that the report should have been made available to the Applicant in a timeous manner after he requested it in November 2007. UNDT found that the Organisation should have properly exercised its discretion and should have provided the report to the Applicant. UNDT found that the non-disclosure of the report contributed to the Applicant’s emotional distress and anxiety, for which he should be compensated in the amount of USD15,000. All other pleas, including with respect to costs and issuance of further announcements concerning his case, were rejected.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Following an investigation in which he was cleared of charges of sexual harassment and sexual assault, the Applicant, a former senior official with the India Office of the United Nations Children’s Fund (“UNICEFâ€), received a letter of reprimand in January 2007 for “inappropriate behaviorâ€. Approximately ten months later the Applicant requested disclosure of the investigation report, issuance of a public statement declaring his innocence, and compensation for his legal defence against the proceedings brought against him by the complainant in domestic courts. When these requests were refused, the Applicant filed an appeal requesting compensation for due process violations, legal costs, and a statement of exoneration by UNICEF.

Legal Principle(s)

Compensation for emotional distress: If the Respondent’s improper actions contributed to the Applicant’s emotional distress and anxiety, the resultant damage warrants compensation.

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Adorna
Entity
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type