Appointment (type)
Appointment of Limited Duration
Performance management
Performance evaluation
Separation from service
Termination of appointment (see also, Termination of appointment)
Termination (of appointment)
Unsatisfactory service
UNAT held that, although no performance evaluation process was legally required for termination, an appropriate procedure should have been followed. UNAT held that UNRWA failed to indicate that the contract would be terminated before its expiration date if the staff member did not improve his performance, and the lack of fair warning rendered the decision to terminate unlawfully. UNAT granted the appeal in part, rescinded the termination decision, and ordered reinstatement, with an in-lieu compensation of two months’ net base salary.