UNAT noted that the deceased staff member, Mr Pise, could have been under no illusion when he signed the payment instruction forms that he had opted to receive, in addition to a deferred pension, his own contributions plus interest as an immediate withdrawal benefit rather than a prospective survivor’s benefit. UNAT noted that he was informed of that interpretation twice subsequent to his separation and did not challenge those determinations. UNAT held that there was no doubt that Mr Pise received the benefits payable to him in terms of the Fund’s Regulations and there was no basis thereunder...
Former Regulation 35
-
Annex I
1
-
Annex IV
1
-
Annex ll
1
-
Article 1
2
-
Article 1(l)
1
-
Article 1(q)
1
-
Article 1(v)
1
-
Article 10
1
-
Article 13
2
-
Article 2
1
-
Article 22
2
-
Article 22(b)
1
-
Article 22(c)
1
-
Article 24
6
-
Article 24(a)
5
-
Article 25
1
-
Article 25(b)(i)
2
-
Article 27
1
-
Article 28
3
-
Article 28(d)
1
-
Article 29
3
-
Article 29(e)
2
-
Article 30
5
-
Article 30(b)
1
-
Article 31
5
-
Article 31 (b) (ii)
0
-
Article 31(a)
1
-
Article 31(b)(i)
1
-
Article 32
3
-
Article 32(a)
1
-
Article 32(b)
1
-
Article 33
7
-
Article 33(a)
6
-
Article 34
10
-
Article 35
3
-
Article 35(b)(i)
1
-
Article 35ter
2
-
Article 38
1
-
Article 4(b)
2
-
Article 4(c)
1
-
Article 40
2
-
Article 44
1
-
Article 45
4
-
Article 48
8
-
Article 48(a)
1
-
Article 49(b)
1
-
Article 50
1
-
Article 50(b)
1
-
Article 53
1
-
Article 54
1
-
Article 6
1
-
Article 6(a)
2
-
Former Regulation 31
1
-
Former Regulation 35
1
-
Regulation 1(n)
0
-
Regulation 30(a)
1
-
Section H.5
1
-
Section K
1
-
Section K.1
1
-
Section K.5
1
-
Section K.8(a)
1
-
Section K.8(b)
1
Showing 1 - 1 of 1