UNAT held that the appeal concerned the interpretation of Article 35 of the UNJSPF Regulations. UNAT found that the Appellant wanted the Standing Committee to accept the period of contributory service with the Fund in order to calculate his own benefit but to take into account a different period vis-à -vis his former spouse. UNAT held that Articles 35bis and 22 of the UNJSPF Regulations were clear and that it could not distinguish where the text was clear. UNAT held that the same date would apply to the calculation of the Appellant’s benefits and the determination of whether his former spouse...
Article 22(c)
-
Annex I
1
-
Annex IV
1
-
Annex ll
1
-
Article 1
2
-
Article 1(l)
1
-
Article 1(q)
1
-
Article 1(v)
1
-
Article 10
1
-
Article 13
2
-
Article 2
1
-
Article 22
2
-
Article 22(b)
1
-
Article 22(c)
1
-
Article 24
6
-
Article 24(a)
5
-
Article 25
1
-
Article 25(b)(i)
2
-
Article 27
1
-
Article 28
3
-
Article 28(d)
1
-
Article 29
3
-
Article 29(e)
2
-
Article 30
5
-
Article 30(b)
1
-
Article 31
5
-
Article 31 (b) (ii)
0
-
Article 31(a)
1
-
Article 31(b)(i)
1
-
Article 32
3
-
Article 32(a)
1
-
Article 32(b)
1
-
Article 33
7
-
Article 33(a)
6
-
Article 34
10
-
Article 35
3
-
Article 35(b)(i)
1
-
Article 35ter
2
-
Article 38
1
-
Article 4(b)
2
-
Article 4(c)
1
-
Article 40
2
-
Article 44
1
-
Article 45
4
-
Article 48
8
-
Article 48(a)
1
-
Article 49(b)
1
-
Article 50
1
-
Article 50(b)
1
-
Article 53
1
-
Article 54
1
-
Article 6
1
-
Article 6(a)
2
-
Former Regulation 31
1
-
Former Regulation 35
1
-
Regulation 1(n)
0
-
Regulation 30(a)
1
-
Section H.5
1
-
Section K
1
-
Section K.1
1
-
Section K.5
1
-
Section K.8(a)
1
-
Section K.8(b)
1
Showing 1 - 1 of 1