国产AV

Article 2.1

  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.10
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4(b)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.2
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1

    UNDT/2024/003, GUEZEL

    TEST -Rename- Benefits and entitlements-45 Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance) Compensation for injury, illness or death attributable to service (Appendix D to Staff Rules) Personal (ratione personae) Subject matter (ratione materiae) Temporal (ratione temporis) Jurisdiction / receivability (UNAT)

    The lack of justifiable explanation on the part of the Respondent for the delay from December 2018 to June 2021 could only be attributed to lack of due care and diligence, transparency, accountability and good faith. Therefore, the Tribunal held that the delay was compensable.

    The Applicant proved beyond a balance of probabilities that the mental and emotional harm suffered by the dependents was directly attributable to the Administration鈥檚 negligent handling of the matter.

    The claim of moral harm was sufficiently proved to the requisite standard.

    Appealed
    Full judgment
    Case digest