国产AV

OAJ Categories

  • Alternative appointment
  • Priority consideration
  • Termination
  • Abusive conduct
  • Contempt
  • Costs
  • Manifest abuse
  • Definition
  • Implied administrative decision
  • Notification
  • Reasons
  • Administrative decision
  • Appointment of Limited Duration
  • Continuing appointment
  • Fixed-term appointment
  • Permanent appointment
  • Probationary appointment
  • Temporary appointment
  • Benefits and entitlements
  • Benefits and entitlements
  • Disciplinary
  • Non-disciplinary
  • Classification (post)
  • Aggravating/mitigating factors
  • Burden of proof
  • Duty of mitigation
  • Evidence of harm
  • Exemplary/punitive damages (prohibition against award of)
  • In-lieu compensation
  • Loss of chance
  • Maximum amount / exceptional circumstances
  • Non-pecuniary (moral) damages
  • Pecuniary (material) damages
  • Conduct of counsel
  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to UN property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
  • Disciplinary matters/ misconduct
  • Discretionary authority
  • Bias/favouritism
  • Gender
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Sexual orientation
  • Access to justice
  • Delay
  • Investigation
  • Right to a hearing
  • Right to appeal
  • Right to comment/respond
  • Right to confront complainant
  • Receivability
  • Retaliation
  • Whistleblower
  • Admissibility
  • Anonymous statements
  • Audio-recordings
  • Compensation
  • Corroboration/hearsay
  • Credibility assessment
  • Evidence of harm
  • Medical evidence
  • Production of evidence
  • Sole testimony of complainant
  • global
  • Execution of order pending appeal
  • Interim measure
  • Manifest excess of jurisdiction
  • Production de documents
  • Receivability
  • Suspension of action
  • Due process
  • Fact-finding investigation
  • Scope of investigation
  • Conflict of interest
  • Recusal
  • Judgment
  • Appeals of final judgments
  • Correction of Judgment
  • Execution of Judgment
  • Interpretation of Judgment
  • Revision of Judgment
  • Appeal
  • Interlocutory appeal
  • Manifest excess of jurisdiction
  • Personal (ratione personae)
  • Subject matter (ratione materiae)
  • Temporal (ratione temporis)
  • UNJSPB
  • Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance
  • Management Evaluation
  • Manifest excess of jurisdiction
  • Personal (ratione personae)
  • Subject matter (ratione materiae)
  • Temporal (ratione temporis)
  • Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance),
  • Legal assistance
  • Legal representation
  • Self-representation
  • Delayed response
  • Extension of time
  • Time limit
  • N/A
  • Arbitrary or improper motive
  • Burden of proof
  • No expectancy of renewal
  • Reason(s)
  • Informal resolution (between parties)
  • Referral to ombudsman / mediation
  • Performance evaluation
  • Rebuttal
  • Indebtedness to a third party
  • Salary deduction
  • Spousal/child support
  • Private legal obligations
  • Waiver of immunity
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Case management
  • Confidentiality
  • Oral hearings
  • Production of documents
  • Reasons
  • Discretion
  • Restructuring
  • Referral for accountability
  • Compensation (see also, Compensation)
  • Rescission
  • Specific performance
  • Post-adjustment
  • Salary scales
  • Abandonment of post
  • Constructive dismissal
  • Expiration of appointment (see also, Non-renewal)
  • Termination of appointment (see also, Termination of appointment)
  • Central Review Body
  • Eligibility
  • Full and fair consideration
  • Interview
  • Selection decision
  • Standard of proof
  • Written test
  • Disciplinary cases
  • Non-disciplinary
  • Disciplinary cases
  • Judicial review (general)
  • Non-renewal
  • Staff selection (non-selection/non-promotion)
  • Termination of appointment
  • Irreparable damage
  • Mootness
  • Particular urgency
  • Prima facie unlawfulness
  • Receivability
  • Staff income tax liability
  • Abolition of position
  • Agreed termination
  • Disciplinary sanction
  • Health reasons
  • Summary dismissal
  • Unsatisfactory service
  • Annual leave
  • Compensation for injury, illness or death attributable to service (Appendix D to Staff Rules)
  • Daily Subsistence Allowance (DSA)
  • Danger/hazard pay
  • Death benefit
  • Dependency benefits
  • Education grant
  • Education grant travel
  • Exceptional Voluntary Separation (EVS)
  • Health (medical) and/or dental insurance
  • Home leave
  • Maternity/paternity leave
  • Mobility/hardship allowance
  • Pension (see also, UNJSPF)
  • Personal Transitional Allowance (PTA)
  • Reimbursement of income tax
  • Relocation grant
  • Rental subsidy
  • Repatriation grant
  • Rest and Recuperation
  • Sabbatical
  • Salary
  • Separation travel
  • Sexual harassment
  • Sick leave
  • Special Education Grant
  • Special leave (with or without pay)
  • Special Post Allowance
  • Termination indemnities
  • Test-TermChild-1
  • Test-TermChild-2
  • Test-TermChild-3
  • Test-TermChild-1
  • Test-TermChild-2
  • Test-TermChild-3
  • Test-TermChild-33
  • Test-TermChild-1
  • Test-TermChild-2
  • ASHI (After-Service Health Insurance)
  • Disability
  • Marital/parental legal obligations (spousal/child support)
  • Pension Adjustment System
  • Prior contributory service/restoration of
  • Receivability (UNAT)
  • Standing Committee of UNJSPB (UN Joint Staff Pension Board)
  • Survivor鈥檚 benefits
  • UNSPC (UN Staff Pension Committee)
  • Validation of prior service
  • Withdrawal
  • Showing 4031 - 4040 of 4085

    Transferred JAB cases are governed by the UNDT Statute. Decisions of the Administrative Tribunal on exceptional circumstances are wrong and should not be followed. Ignorance of the law held not relevant. Where the UNDT Statute is ambiguous, interpretation should preserve rights and uphold justice so far as the language permits. Outcome: The appeal was submitted within time and is receivable.

    The Dispute Tribunal may suspend or waive the deadlines for the filing of applications imposed by the Statute and Rules of Procedure, but may not suspend or waive the deadlines in the Staff Rules concerning management evaluation because this is the prerogative of the Secretary-General.The drafters of the Statute of the Dispute Tribunal intended that all applications to the Tribunal would be subject to the rules under which this Tribunal operates. Therefore, pursuant to Article 8.3 of the Statute, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to extend the deadlines for the filing of requests for...

    The High commissioner is not bound to follow the recommendations of the Appointments, Promotion, and Postings Commission, but he cannot grant a promotion without the situation of the eligible official having been examined by the Commission. It is for the Administration to establish a list of promotions based on regulations put in place in order to reconcile the imperatives for advancement based on merit and that of gender balance and, if necessary, by introducing quotas. Failing to have such regulations in place, the Administration must apply the regulation in force. It is up to the...

    The High Commissioner is not bound to follow the recommendations of the Appointments, Promotions, and Postings Commission, but he cannot grant a promotion without the situation of the eligible official having been examined by the Commission. It is up to the administration to establish the list of promotions to put in place regulations to reconcile the two imperatives of advancement on merit and that of gender parity, if necessary by establishing quotas. Failing to have such regulations in place, the administration must apply the regulations in force. .Article 10, paragraph 5, of the Tribunal's...

    The time limit for appeal runs from the date on which the appellant receives the Secretary General's response to her request for review. If the Administration maintains that it received it before the date indicated by the Applicant, it is up to the Administration to provide proof thereof. The minutes of the sessions held by the Appointments, Promotions, and Assignments Committee are documents allowing the judge to verify the procedure followed by the Commission. To obtain the annulment of a decision refusing promotion, the Applicant must establish either that the list of promotions was taken...

    When a time limit for filing an appeal expires on a Sunday, the appeal presented on the following Monday is admissible. Since, neither in his introductory appeal nor by subsequent briefs or orally at the hearing, the applicant made explicit reference to the arguments contained in the request for review which he made to the Secretary-General, the judge confines itself to examining the arguments expressly raised. While it is up to the judge to rule on the regularity of promotion procedures and on factual errors made by the administration, it is not for him to take the place of the High...

    The judge makes his decision on the basis of all the documents in the file to the extent that all the parties are aware of them and have been able to discuss them. He must not exclude a document produced by a party unless it is submitted after the expiry of a time limit which he himself has fixed or which is imposed on him by the texts and only if this document is not likely to modify the outcome of the dispute, a hypothesis which requires the judge to grant the parties additional time to ensure compliance with the adversarial proceedings. The regulations in force for establishing the list of...