UNDT/2024/051

UNDT/2024/051, Shaban

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant in this case was given the opportunity to complete his application with the mandatory prerequisite for the filing of an application before the UNDT. The Applicant appears to have misunderstood what constitutes a “management evaluation request”. He assumed that querying the process with the hiring manager, and later, the Mission’s Chief of Staff, constitutes “management evaluation” for the purposes of proceedings before the UNDT. It does not.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged his non-selection to the GS-6 post of Information Technology Assistant which he had applied to.

Legal Principle(s)

In accordance with staff rules 11.2(a) and (c), and art. 8(1)(c) of the Tribunal’s Statute it was incumbent on the Applicant to seek review of the decision he wishes to impugn by the Management Advice and Evaluation Section.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Shaban

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :