UNDT/2023/035

UNDT/2023/035, Taklu-Nagga

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The documents on record demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the Applicant had rented out his flat in Addis Ababa to two other staff members, based on a lease with an inflated rent (and without paying agent’s fees), and that the latter two used that lease to claim rental subsidy from UNHCR in an amount undue.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the Respondent’s decision to dismiss him from service of the Organization pursuant to staff rule 10.2(a)(ix). The disciplinary measure was imposed for three separate allegations of fraud and one allegation of corruption.

Legal Principle(s)

In reviewing a disciplinary measure, the Dispute Tribunal should determine: (a) whether the alleged facts have been established; (b) whether the established facts constitute misconduct; (c) whether the disciplinary measure is proportionate to the offence; and (d) whether due process was respected.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Taklu-Nagga

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :