UNDT/2023/019

UNDT/2023/019, Humackic

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The principal claim against administrative inaction has become moot following the reassignments of both the Applicant and her supervisor. The reassignment decision created an essentially different factual and legal outcome of the Applicant’s complaint under ST/SGB/2019/8.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Non-implementation of the United Nations Office of the Ombudsman and Mediation Services’ (“UNOMS”) recommendation to the UNIFIL Force Commander to separate the Applicant from her First Reporting Officer.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

Outcome Extra Text

The application is dismissed as not receivable.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Humackic

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :