UNDT/2022/121

UNDT/2022/121, Hanjoury

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant’s claim was based on her assertion that she was on official travel status at United Nations expense when she was forced to have a stopover of 23 days in Khartoum. Accordingly, she claimed that she was entitled to DSA in accordance with staff rule 7.10. The Tribunal found, however, that there was no category under the applicable legal framwework of entitlement to DSA under which the Applicant’s time in Khartoum fell.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to pay her daily subsistence allowance (“DSA”) for 23 days, from 24 August to 24 September 2021.

Legal Principle(s)

The starting point for judicial review is a presumption that official acts have been regularly performed. A determination as to whether the presumption has been rebutted turns on the facts of the case and an interpretation of the applicable regulatory framework.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Hanjoury

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :