UNDT/2022/018

UNDT/2022/018, TOSON

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The impugned “decision” carried no “direct legal consequences” given that it was not final and remains open to challenge by way of rebuttal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the Respondent’s decision to finalise his performance appraisal for the year 2020; the process for which he contends was irregular. T

Legal Principle(s)

A staff member may not challenge the intermediate or preparatory steps of an administrative decision. Only the final decision which carries direct legal consequences for the staff member’s legal rights and obligations is receivable.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

Outcome Extra Text

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

TOSON

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :