¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2021/150

UNDT/2021/150, Tepamose

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application was not receivable ratione temporis because it should have been filed on or before 11 November 2021 but was filed on 1 December 2021.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the non-renewal of his contract following the abolition of his post.

Legal Principle(s)

The issue of receivability is one which in appropriate cases, such as this one, the Tribunal may determine on a priority basis without awaiting the Respondent’s reply. Article 8.1(d)(i)(a) of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute stipulates that in cases where a request for management evaluation of a contested decision is required the application shall only be receivable if it is filed within 90 calendar days of the Applicant’s receipt of the response to the RME. Time limits for formal contestations are to be strictly enforced, a day late is by no means de minimis. Whether a deadline is missed by several minutes, several hours, or several days is irrelevant.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable
Outcome Extra Text

 

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Tepamose
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type