¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2021/121, Chawla

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application was not receivable because the Applicant was contesting an MEU response, which is not an appealable administrative decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The decision by MEU to close the Applicant's case as moot without any consideration of the remedy he sought in his request for management evaluation.

Legal Principle(s)

The response from the Management Evaluation Unit (MEU) to a management evaluation request is not an administrative decision subject to judicial review by the Dispute Tribunal. Rather, the judicially reviewable administrative decision is the underlying decision “that is alleged to be in non-compliance with the terms of appointment or the contract of employment of the staff member".

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable
Outcome Extra Text

 

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Chawla
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law