UNDT/2021/004

UNDT/2021/004, Branglidor

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal dismissed the application for the following reasons: the facts had been established to the requisite standard of clear and convincing evidence because the Applicant failed to provide any evidence to contradict the Respondent’s fundamental findings on the objective and subjective elements of the impugned conduct; the established facts qualified as misconduct because the Applicant failed to act with the diligence required of staff applying for education grant entitlements pursuant to ST/AI/2011/4; the sanction was not disproportionate because it was not the most severe sanction for that type of misconduct and was consistent with the established practice in similar matters; and the alleged violations of due process were not substantiated by the Applicant.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Disciplinary measure of separation from service with compensation in lieu of notice and without termination indemnity in accordance with staff rule 10.2(a)(viii).

Legal Principle(s)

Witness statements may be relied on in the absence of the witnesses’ oral evidence before the Tribunal where the evidence in the statements are confirmed by other documents/evidence and are: exhaustive, voluntary, credible, coherent and do not disclose any tendency to unduly incriminate the Applicant.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Branglidor

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :