UNDT/2020/214

UNDT/2020/214, Gomez Fernandez

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant remains on special leave with full pay at the time of the judgment. The decision to terminate his appointment remains suspended and has no impact on his terms of appointment, the application is therefore not receivable ratione materiae.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Termination of continuing appointment following abolition of pot

Legal Principle(s)

An administrative decision can only be judicially reviewed when it produces direct legal consequences for the applicant’s terms of appointment.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Gomez Fernandez

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :