UNDT/2020/203

UNDT/2020/203, Brierley

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Since the Applicant remains on special leave with full pay pending management evaluation at the time of the judgment, the termination decision remains suspended and has not yielded effects on the Applicant’s terms of appointment. The application is therefore not receivable. The action or inaction of the Administration to find an alternative post for the Applicant after he was first placed on special leave with full pay is not receivable because the Applicant did not include this ground in his request for management evaluation.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Termination of Applicant’s appointment following abolition of his post.

Legal Principle(s)

Only administrative decisions that produce direct legal effects on the applicant’s terms of appointment are capable of judicial review.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

Outcome Extra Text

Application not receivable ratione materiae

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Brierley

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :