¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2020/079

UNDT/2020/079, Ponze-Gonzalez

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that it lacked jurisdiction to review preparatory steps of an administrative decision and rejected the application as not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant was contesting the failure to afford full and fair consideration to his candidacy for the post of P-5 Chief, Operations and Resource Management, advertised under Recruit from Roster exercise number 104637 and abuse of authority in cancelling the RFR in violation of the applicable rules following his unlawful disqualification.

Legal Principle(s)

Applications which challenge the cancellation of a recruitment process are not receivable and must fail. A selection process involves a series of steps or findings which lead to the administrative decision. These steps may be challenged only in the context of an appeal against the outcome of the selection process, but cannot alone be the subject of an appeal to the UNDT. A selection process may only be challenged in the context of an appeal against the outcome of that process and where the selection exercise is cancelled, there is no contestable decision.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable
Outcome Extra Text

The Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to review preparatory steps of an administrative decision and rejected it.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Ponze-Gonzalez
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type