¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2020/047

UNDT/2020/047, Fraenkel

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The evidence shows that the Applicant was never separated from the Organization. The Applicant’s request to be placed on a post at the D-1 level post is therefore moot. The outcome of the complaint of harassment was not included in the management evaluation request as such complaint was, at the time, still under investigation. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review that administrative decision because it was not reviewed by the management evaluation unit under art.8.1(c) of the Tribunal’s Statute. Related

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The decision to abolish the Applicant’s post.

Legal Principle(s)

The key characteristic of an administrative decision subject to judicial review is that the decision must produce direct legal consequences affecting a staff member’s terms and conditions of appointment. The Administration has power to restructure its departments. This discretion extends to the abolition of posts and the Tribunal may not interfere with a genuine organizational restructuring even though it may have resulted in the loss of employment of staff. An applicant cannot challenge the discretionary authority of the Administration to restructure the Organization or to abolish his or her post. The Applicant, however, may challenge an administrative decision resulting from the restructuring once that decision has been made.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Fraenkel
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type