¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2020/037

UNDT/2020/037, Rozefort

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant’s appointment was not extended beyond its expiration due to the liquidation of the Mission. The decision not to extend the appointment was supported by the evidence and therefore lawful. The fact that the Applicant had incurred in personal debt does not generate an obligation on the Administration to find her an alternate post upon the closure of the Mission.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Non-renewal of Applicant’s fixed-term appointment following abolition of her post.

Legal Principle(s)

Fixed-term appointments do not carry an expectation of renewal. Separation as a result of expiration of a fixed-term appointment takes place automatically, without prior notice, on the expiration date specified in the letter of appointment. The decision not to renew a fixed-term appointment can be challenged on the grounds that the Administration has not acted fairly, justly, or transparently with the staff member or was motivated by bias, prejudice or improper motive. The applicant must prove that improper motives tainted the decision. The abolition of a post is a lawful reason not to renew a fixed-term appointment

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Rozefort
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type