¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2020/010

UNDT/2020/010, Alquza

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application is rejected. UN Women, in denying the Applicant’s request for an ex gratia payment in lieu of Special Post Allowance, did not exceed its authority. UN Women did not fail to properly apply staff rule 12.3(b) as the requested ex gratia payment was a matter that could not be treated as an exception to the Staff Rules by applying staff rule 12.3(b). Additionally, under UN Women’s Financial Regulations and Rules, the request made by the Applicant does not fall within the parameters for an ex gratia payment. There is no basis within the regulatory framework for further reward by way of ex gratia payment. The Applicant is not entitled to the relief claimed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Administration’s refusal to grant an ex gratia payment in lieu of Special Post Allowance.

Legal Principle(s)

The Dispute Tribunal has the inherent power to individualize and define the administrative decision challenged by a party and to identify the subject(s) of judicial review. Staff rule 12.3(b) only gives a staff member a right to have a request for an exception considered, but not to have it granted. The three elements of Staff Rule 12.3(b) are: (a) Such an exception must be consistent with the Staff Regulations and other decisions of the General Assembly; (b) Such an exception must be agreed to by the staff member directly affected; and (c) Such an exception, in the opinion of the Secretary-General, must not be prejudicial to the interests of any other staff member or group of staff members. The Administration is given a certain latitude of discretion under staff rule 12.3(b). the Dispute Tribunal’s judicial review is limited to legal matters, in particular how the decision-maker reached her/his decision, and it is not to replace the decision-maker by assessing the correctness of the merits of this decision. Doctrine of equal pay for equal work by reference to art. 23.2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The doctrine would not apply as this would otherwise render staff rule 3.10(a) and (b) unlawful and that the Dispute and Appeals Tribunals do not have the power to overturn these provisions.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Alquza
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type