UNDT/2019/160

UNDT/2019/160, Handy

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application was moot because the contested decision was effectively rescinded and superseded by subsequent renewals of the Applicant’s appointment. The application was dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to not renew his fixed-term appointment.

Legal Principle(s)

In cases where the Administration rescinds the contested decision during the; proceedings, the applicant’s allegations may be moot unless the applicant can prove that they still sustain an injury for which the Trinbunal can award relief.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Handy

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :