UNDT/2019/018, Diop
UNDT held that the principal legal issue arising for consideration in the case was whether the Applicant’s qualifications met the requirement of a recognized first level university degree as required by the job opening she was selected for. The Tribunal held that the Applicant did not meet the minimum educational requirements for positions at the P-2 level and was not eligible to be considered for a one-time amnesty for staff members under section 6 of ST/AI/2018/5. The Tribunal held that the Applicant did not demonstrate unfairness, unjustness, lack of transparency or inappropriate motive in the Respondent’s non-renewal of her appointment. The Tribunal recalled that the Administration is under an obligation to put an end to illegal situations as soon as it becomes aware of them.
The Applicant challenged the decision not to renew her appointment because she did not meet the minimum educational requirements for the position.
N/A