AV

UNDT/2018/079

UNDT/2018/079, Koduru

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal concluded that the decision to separate the Applicant was discriminatory, constituted abuse of authority and was therefore unlawful because of the apparent bad faith on the part of the Applicant’s supervisor in initiating and concluding a new recruitment contrary to the Civilian Staffing Review recommendation, and her unauthorized nationalization of the Applicant’s post one year before the approved date. To ensure the Applicant’s continuity of service when decisions are being made about her eligibility for a continuing appointment and after service health insurance, the Tribunal ordered her reinstatement in service for the approximately 7-week period she was separated from service. Additionally, the Applicant was awarded compensation for the earnings she lost between the date she was wrongfully separated from service and the date she was appointed to UNMIL. The Applicant’s testimony was not compelling enough to serve as the evidentiary basis for an award of moral damages under the amended art. 10.5(b) of the UNDT Statute.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment due to the abolishment of her post.

Legal Principle(s)

The Organization has the power to restructure some or all its departments or units by way of abolition of posts, the creation of new posts and the redeployment of staff but “even in a restructuring exercise, like any other administrative decision, the Administration has the duty to act fairly, justly and transparently in dealing with its staff members.” Article 10.5(a) of the UNDT Statute allows the Tribunal to rescind unlawful administrative decisions while art. 10.5(b) regulates awards of compensation. General Assembly resolution 69/203 amended art. 10.5(b) of the UNDT Statute to ensure that compensation is ordered only for harm and that the existence of such harm is proven or supported by adequate evidence.

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

The decision not to renew the Applicant’s appointment and separate her from service was rescinded. The Respondent was ordered to reinstate the Applicant in service from 1 July to 22 August 2015 and pay her net base salary and entitlements for the period 1 July to 22 August 2015.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Koduru
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type