¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2016/085

UNDT/2016/085, Hashim

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Restructuring process: The Tribunal concluded that there were no procedural irregularities in either the creation of Oversight and Support Division (OSD) or the subsequent restructuring/realignment process. Both were undertaken in a fully transparent manner, with full consultation of all staff members including the Applicant. Sufficiency of reasons: The Tribunal concluded that the Applicant was given reasons for the decision on more than one occasion including those conveyed to her by her staff representative following a meeting with UNDP Senior Management. These reasons were based on the restructuring and resulting redundancy of her position. Legitimate expectation: The Tribunal noted that the OSD Team Leader assured the Applicant that she would continue to manage the communications functions as shown in the PACOM organogram after the hiring of the PACOM Team Coordinator. However this was a reiteration of her existing TOR, not a promise that her contract would be renewed on its expiry.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment with UNDP Sudan. The Tribunal found that the Applicant had not discharged the burden of proving that the decision not to renew her FTA on its expiry was vitiated by procedural irregularity or was ill motivated. The Application was dismissed.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Hashim
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type