UNDT/2016/075, Mukhopadhyay
Mission area was not defined in ST/AI/2006/5. However, the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC) Hardship Classification provided a list of duty stations located in a country and, for the DRC where MONUSCO is, Kinshasa and Goma were classified as separate duty stations. For purposes of classification of family duty stations or non-family duty stations, the Office of Human Resource Management’s (OHRM) list of non-family “duty stations,” as at 1 January 2014, classified Kinshasa and Goma as two distinct duty stations. Additionally, the report of the Secretary-General to the General Assembly referred to Kinshasa and Goma as two duty stations. The ICSC’s list and classification of duty stations informed, and formed the basis of, the Secretary-General and OHRM’s own lists and reports. It was not lawful for the Administration to substitute ST/AI/2006/5 with its own guidelines, so as to deprive the Applicants of their right to opt for the relocation grant. The circumstances surrounding these applications fell squarely within the ambit of ST/AI/2006/5; which afforded the Applicants with the right to a relocation grant.
Thirteen Applicants contested the decisions denying their claims for lump-sum relocation grants for the shipment of their personal effects on being reassigned from Kinshasa to Goma in 2014.
It is permissible for the Respondent to issue Guidelines or manuals that may explain the implementation of a Staff Rule or an Administrative Issuance. But these Guidelines cannot replace the clear provisions of an Administrative Issuance or Staff Rule. A policy that is not reflected in an administrative issuance has no legal basis. The principle of legislative hierarchy determined in Villamoran is applicable only where there is a conflict between guidelines and manuals and a properly promulgated administrative issuance. In the absence of an administrative instruction, the manual or guideline is applicable.
The Tribunal ordered rescission of the contested decisions.