UNDT/2014/005, Terragnolo
The Tribunal found that the first part of the application was not receivable, since the Applicant lacked legal standing, and that the second part of the application, while receivable, was unfounded, since the Secretary-General, who has the duty to facilitate the holding of the elections to the UNSCP, had no power, whatsoever, to interfere in the actual conduct and results of the elections.
The Applicant contests the decisions to grant time release and administrative support to “ineligible staff representatives” to the United Nations Staff Pension Committee (“UNSPC”), and the refusal, by the ASG/OHRM on behalf of the Secretary-General, to take action on the notification that one of these elected members allegedly had a conflict of interest and committed electoral violations during the polls.
Legal standing: If an Applicant has no stake in the contested administrative decision since his individual rights and terms of employment were not affected by it, the application has to be rejected for lack of legal standing. Staff members’ rights as a UNJSPF participant: It results from staff regulation 6.1 and staff rule 6.1 that a staff member who is a participant in the UNJSPF has a right to proper representation in the Fund’s governance structure. Therefore, a decision, on behalf of the Secretary-General, not to take action on a claim for conflict of interest and breach of electoral regulations at UNSPC elections constitutes an administrative decision under art. 2 of the Tribunal’s Statute. The Secretary-General's authority in election matters to the UNSPC: The UNSPC is an integral part of the administration of the Fund and its governance structure; accordingly, the eligibility of candidates to represent participants at the UNSPC, including any potential conflict of interest or length of term, is to be determined exclusively under the Fund’s Regulations and Rules, which is a self-contained regime, into which the Secretary-General cannot interfere.